https://ir.nilds.gov.ng//handle/123456789/37 Mon, 20 Apr 2026 22:57:32 GMT 2026-04-20T22:57:32Z https://ir.nilds.gov.ng//handle/123456789/3039 The Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions: Challenges and Prospects Yahaya, Shamsu; Omoarebu, Nansat The Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions in the Senate plays a crucial role in upholding legislative integrity, protecting the rights and privileges of lawmakers, and providing an accessible platform for citizens to seek redress against public authorities. While the Committee is mandated to investigate petitions, enforce standards of official conduct, and protect legislative privileges, it faces significant hurdles that affect its efficiency and impact. There is also a notable gap in academic and policy research focused specifically on the challenges this Committee faces, especially compared to other legislative committees. Hence, this research examines the challenges confronting the Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions in the National Assembly and proffers practicable recommendations. The research adopts the doctrinal research methodology and relies on primary and secondary sources. Primary source materials used include the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as altered), legislation, and the Standing Orders of the Senate. Furthermore, the research utilised secondary sources, including textbooks, journals, newspapers and internet materials. This research analyses the legal framework underpinning the Committee’s operations, identifies key operational and structural challenges, and proposes recommendations to enhance its effectiveness. This research finds that numerous challenges confront the Committee, including an overwhelming workload stemming from the free and accessible nature of the petition process, high turnover among committee members, the filing procedure, and frequent non-compliance with its recommendations by government agencies. Therefore, this research recommends amending the Legislative Houses (Powers and Privileges) Act, 2018, to specifically prescribe fines for failure to respond to the Senate's summons by witnesses, and to establish a special administrative unit within the Committee to enforce compliance with resolutions. Wed, 01 Oct 2025 00:00:00 GMT https://ir.nilds.gov.ng//handle/123456789/3039 2025-10-01T00:00:00Z https://ir.nilds.gov.ng//handle/123456789/1795 A Review of the Legal and Regulatory Framework on Cryptocurrency in Nigeria Yahaya, Shamsu; Omoarebu, Nansat This Brief analysed the legal and regulatory framework on cryptocurrency in Nigeria. The Brief argued that the legal and regulatory framework on cryptocurrency in Nigeria is evolving, driven by the rapid growth of digital assets and the need for effective oversight to protect investors and promote innovation. The research has demonstrated that while the Central Bank of Nigeria's earlier stance on cryptocurrency transactions created uncertainty in the market, recent developments indicate a shift towards recognising and regulating digital assets as securities under the Investment and Securities Act. This shift presents an opportunity for Nigeria to harness the potential of blockchain technology and digital currencies while mitigating the risks associated with fraud and volatility. However, the current regulatory framework remains fragmented, with overlapping responsibilities among multiple regulatory bodies. This complexity can hinder effective enforcement and compliance, emphasising the need for a more cohesive and comprehensive regulatory approach. Ultimately, a robust legal and regulatory framework will enable Nigeria to tap into the benefits of digital assets and position it as a leader in the rapidly evolving global cryptocurrency ecosystem. Accordingly, the Brief recommends as follows: 1. Need for the SEC to provide for strict Anti-Money Laundering and KYC (Know Your Customer) Regulations across all crypto platforms to reduce fraud and illicit activities. 2. Nigeria currently lacks a well-defined ADR framework for resolving disputes arising from cryptocurrency transactions, particularly those involving cross-border transactions, leaving participants vulnerable in the event of conflicts. Hence, there is need for amendment of the Investment and Securities Act, 2025 to make provision for arbitration to resolve disputes, especially for cross-border transactions, similar to the practice in the U.S.A. 3. There is need for the National Assembly to streamline regulatory roles of multiple agencies, especially CBN and SEC, and encourage inter-agency collaboration, for effective regulation of cryptocurrency. 4. There is also a need for continued education around cryptocurrency and its underlying technology to promote a secure and informed investment environment. Sun, 01 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT https://ir.nilds.gov.ng//handle/123456789/1795 2025-06-01T00:00:00Z https://ir.nilds.gov.ng//handle/123456789/1561 Review of the Nigeria Police Act 2020 (Amendment) Bill, 2024 Omoregie, Edoba B. This report examines the Nigeria Police Act, 2020 (Amendment) Bill, 2024 which seeks to increase the service years of police personnel from 35 years to 40 of service, and from 60 to 65 years of age, as the case may be. The report evaluates the justifications proffered by the sponsors for seeking the increase, and finds that none of the justifications is sustainable in light of the stressful nature of police duties and other factors. The report advocates the retention of the present 35 years of service or 60 years of age of retirement and recommends other measures to motivate police personnel for improved performance rather than increase in service years proposed in the Bill. Sat, 01 Jun 2024 00:00:00 GMT https://ir.nilds.gov.ng//handle/123456789/1561 2024-06-01T00:00:00Z https://ir.nilds.gov.ng//handle/123456789/1559 An Analysis of the Recognition of Ownership and an Order Vesting Custody and Management of the Repatriated Looted Benin Artefacts in the Oba of Benin Kingdom, 2023 Oguche, Samuel; Imoedemhe, Walter; Omoregie, Edoba B. This legal issue brief analyses the Order recognizing ownership, and vesting custody and management of the repatriated looted Benin Artefacts in the Oba of Benin. The brief appraises the rationale for the Order in the context of the historical circumstances leading to the looting of those works of art and spiritual heritage of the Benin People. The brief also considers the international law justifications for return of stolen artefacts to their rightful owners, including the Oba of Benin. Wed, 01 May 2024 00:00:00 GMT https://ir.nilds.gov.ng//handle/123456789/1559 2024-05-01T00:00:00Z