Show simple item record

The Constitutional Paradox of the Attorney-General in Nigeria: Reconciling Political Accountability with Prosecutorial Independence

dc.contributor.authorAmali, Mohammed
dc.contributor.authorOmoarebu, Nansat S.
dc.contributor.authorObot, Uduakobong J.
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-06T10:08:05Z
dc.date.available2026-10-06T10:08:05Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.identifier.isbn978-978-67-1051-8
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.nilds.gov.ng//handle/123456789/3660
dc.descriptionLaw, Ethics and Good Governance: Selected Essays in Honour of Chief Godwin Kanu Agabi, CON, SAN, FNIALSen_US
dc.description.abstractThe office of the Attorney-General occupies a unique constitutional position in Nigeria, serving simultaneously as the chief law officer of the Federation or a State and a political appointee within the executive branch. This dual character has generated persistent tensions between the demands of political accountability and the imperative of prosecutorial independence, particularly in the exercise of the Attorney-General’s constitutional powers to institute, undertake, take over, and discontinue criminal proceedings. While political accountability ensures democratic oversight of executive action, the broad prosecutorial discretion vested in the Attorney-General raises concerns regarding selective prosecution, abuse of process, and executive interference in the administration of criminal justice. This chapter critically examines the constitutional and jurisprudential foundations of the Attorney-General’s office in Nigeria, interrogating the extent to which its current institutional design adequately safeguards the rule of law and the impartial administration of justice. Drawing on constitutional provisions, judicial decisions, comparative perspectives from selected common law jurisdictions, and established principles of prosecutorial independence, the chapter argues that the constitutional fusion of political and prosecutorial functions creates an inherent paradox that has undermined public confidence in the criminal justice system. It contends that while complete insulation of the Attorney- General from political oversight may neither be feasible nor constitutionally desirable, clearer legal safeguards and institutional reforms are necessary to reconcile democratic accountability with the independence required for fair and impartial prosecution. The chapter concludes by proposing reforms aimed at strengthening prosecutorial autonomy while preserving legitimate mechanisms of constitutional and democratic accountability, thereby promoting greater integrity, transparency, and public trust in Nigeria's criminal justice system.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAttorney-Generalen_US
dc.subjectPolitical Accountabilityen_US
dc.subjectProsecutorial Discretionen_US
dc.subjectProsecutorial Independenceen_US
dc.subjectRule of Lawen_US
dc.titleThe Constitutional Paradox of the Attorney-General in Nigeria: Reconciling Political Accountability with Prosecutorial Independenceen_US
dc.title.alternativeLAW, ETHICS AND GOOD GOVERNANCE: SELECTED ESSAYS IN HONOUR OF CHIEF GODWIN KANU AGABI, CON, SAN, FNIALSen_US
dc.typeBook chapteren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record