APPRAISAL OF THE ROLE OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY IN THE APPROPRIATION PROCESS IN NIGERIA: HINTS FROM CROSS-COUNTRY SURVEY

Abstract

One of the crucial functions of the National Assembly (NASS) is appropriation of funds for the running of the government. Appropriation is one of the key components of legislative oversight which earns the legislature power of the purse. One of the challenges that have plagued performance of the NASS in recent time, particularly the 8th Assembly, is the allegation of ‘padding’ in the appropriation process which has brought the legislature to ridicule in public domain. This paper undertakes an analysis of the role of the NASS in the appropriation process and contends that an appropriation bill is like every other bill. The paper finds succour in section 59 of the Constitution which clearly gives the NASS powers over appropriation bills. It contends that going by the clear provisions of the Constitution as well as judicial authorities, especially the unassailable judgment of the Federal High Court in FALANA V. THE PRESIDENT, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA & 3 ORS, the NASS has the powers to alter an appropriation bill presented by the President. It further maintains the position that what the President lays before the NASS is a mere proposal which the latter is not bound to accept wholly. The completely dismisses the notion of ‘padding’ and, among others, recommends pre-budget consultations between the legislature and the executive to reduce disagreements in the process of passage. It also recommends passage of a budget process law to regulate appropriation process in Nigeria.