An Appraisal of Corruption Fight in Nigeria: A Comparative Study of Goodluck Jonathan and Muhammadu Buhari Administrations

Abstract

The research conducted a comprehensive analysis of the anti-corruption efforts during the tenure of Goodluck Jonathan and Muhammadu Buhari through a comparative lens. Employing the institutional theory as the analytical framework, the study utilised a qualitative descriptive method relying on secondary data sources. Results indicated that both Presidents Goodluck Jonathan and Muhammadu Buhari employed institutional and legal strategies to combat corruption in Nigeria. Notably, the findings revealed that President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration achieved more significant anti-corruption outcomes compared to the Goodluck Jonathan administration. This success was particularly evident in terms of arrests, prosecution of corrupt officials, and the attainment of convictions. Despite these achievements, both administrations faced challenges, including allegations of weaponising the anti-corruption fight against political rivals and selective prosecution to favour political allies. In light of these findings, the study recommended greater autonomy for anti-graft agencies. Furthermore, it emphasised the importance of the succeeding administration building upon the achievements of the Buhari-led government in the fight against corruption. The study advocated for a comprehensive and transparent anti-corruption campaign that avoids selective arrests and prosecution, fostering a holistic approach to tackling corruption.